CCCS's anti-competitive ruling on Grab-Uber merger fair: lawyers
They say deal has led to substantial reduction in competition and high entry barriers for new players
Singapore
CONTRARY to Grab's view, the ruling by the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS) that its takeover of Uber's South-east Asian business threatens competition is fair, lawyers told The Business Times. It is CCCS's role to ensure a level playing field so that consumers don't get held to ransom by monopolies or near monopolies, they said.
Their comments follow Grab's written response to CCCS last week explaining why it disagrees with the Commission's decision that the Grab-Uber merger has led to a "substantial lessening of competition" in the ridehailing sector. The comments also come after GGV Capital - an early investor of Grab - proclaimed that such a decision could hurt innovation and limit investor interest in Singapore and South-east Asia.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Startups
Vietnam education startup Prep bags US$7 million in Series A funding
Cruise operator Viking prices IPO within range to raise US$1.54 billion: source
Ninja Van axes more than 20 employees in tech team in Singapore
Temasek-backed PsiQuantum to build first commercial quantum computer
Fast-fashion giant Shein wants to sell skincare, toothpaste and toys, too
GoTo narrows Q1 loss to 420 billion rupiah with TikTok deal, cost cuts