Getting ahead of ourselves, and our crimes
How can we mitigate the potential risks to privacy and choice arising from AI and pre-crime tech?
ADVANCEMENTS in artificial intelligence (AI) combined with increasing availability of behavioural data has made pre-crime a possibility. This is the ability to predict a future threat or non-compliance event. You may recall the movie Minority Report - today, pre-crime is no longer relegated to a remote possibility within science fiction but an actively pursued ambition.
What would the unlocking of such capabilities truly mean? Would it be an Orwellian social system or a true vanguard of safety? Given the broad range of possibilities, it is important for there to be a clear agenda on how such insight would be used in order to mitigate potential risks arising from pre-crime tech.
There are manifold reasons for a future threat or event of non-compliance - for example, unintentional error, deliberate intent, general non-compliance and so forth. However, the common process of their detection is primarily through investigation or audit.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
‘I felt like dying’: Thai Singha beer scion speaks up after disclosure of alleged sexual abuse
Japan’s Asics to spin off popular Onitsuka Tiger sneaker business; shares rise
CDL, Hong Realty trump 3 other bidders with S$542.4 million offer at S$1,865 psf ppr for Peck Hay plot
The returnees: Inside China’s AI talent reversal