Reit benchmarks seen pulling up rents elsewhere
They own only 20-22% of retail assets: further studies urged
[SINGAPORE] The argument that real estate investment trusts (Reits) are responsible for hiking up retail rents is often made, but the more difficult part is to say how.
Statistics show that Reits do not own the bulk of retail space here, debunking the common perception that they are market leaders in an oligopolic structure. Neither do they hold a majority of the prime malls, so the idea that their ownership of the highest-demand locations gives them pricing power doesn't quite hold.
Property consultants say the likely explanation then is simply that other landlords are benchmarking their rates to Reits, given the market transparency that the listed Reits practise - an effect they called "herding".
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
New Articles
Digital Core Reit Q1 distributable income slips 2.4% to US$10.6 million
BT subscribers can now share 5 premium articles a month with unlimited number of non-subscribers
First Reit reports 3.2% lower Q1 DPU of S$0.006 amid interest rate, forex headwinds
Vietnam holds first gold auction in 11 years to stabilise market
How Hudson Yards went from ghost town to office success story
Hot stock: Nanofilm jumps 13.1% amid heavy trading on improved Q1 results