Electricity? Methanol? LNG? Fuel of choice for future is unknown
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
LAST week's column discussed the claim by environmental campaign group Transport & Environment (T&E) that natural gas is a "US$22 billion distraction for EU shipping that won't decarbonise the sector".
It seems SEA\LNG, the multi-sector industry coalition aiming to accelerate the widespread adoption of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a marine fuel, also noticed T&E's statement; while not actually mentioning the critical T&E assessment of LNG, the coalition spelled out its view of how critical continuing investment in LNG as a marine fuel is to meeting both air-quality and greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions targets.
SEA\LNG said its statement is aimed at ensuring that industry and governments "make a pragmatic and balanced analysis of the future of maritime fuels".
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
Ministry of Home Affairs Permanent Secretary Pang Kin Keong to retire
Shelving S$5 billion office redevelopment plan proved ‘wise’ as geopolitical risks mount: OCBC chairman
Richard Eu on how core values, customers keep Singapore’s TCM chain Eu Yan Sang relevant
China pips the US if Asean is forced to choose, but analysts warn against reading it like a sports result