Is the 60/40 balanced portfolio dead? Not quite
Stocks and bonds now offer attractive entry points and yields. This bodes well for long-term returns for a 60/40 portfolio
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
AMID a year of dismal asset returns, spiking correlations and volatility, several pundits have sounded warnings against the traditional 60/40 (stock/bond) portfolio that has been a mainstay of retirement investing.
But calling the death of a balanced 60/40 allocation may well be premature. Stocks and bonds, which this year suffered their worst year in decades, now offer attractive entry points and yields. This bodes well for long-term returns.
Sticking to a regular investment, however, still calls for courage. Year-to-date returns from both asset classes remain in the red, and uncertainty on various fronts hangs heavily. Double-digit losses on a 60/40 portfolio are the worst since the 1930s.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
Vietnam formalises new state leadership, redefining ‘four pillars’ power balance
‘Largest Singapore commercial S-Reit proxy’: analysts say buy CICT shares after Paragon acquisition
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
Why where you park your joint venture matters: Lessons from a US$689 million shareholder dispute