You are here

What 'average inflation targeting' means for investors

The Federal Reserve has unveiled a new policy framework in the hope of boosting inflation. These are the implications for bond markets.

BT_20200912_SCHRODERS12_4238419.jpg
The Fed's new policy framework seeks to achieve inflation that averages 2% over time.

LATE-AUGUST saw the Federal Reserve (Fed) hold its keenly-watched annual Jackson Hole Economic Policy Symposium. Against a backdrop of the huge global uncertainty engendered by Covid-19, the focus on the conference was sharp.

Central banks have implemented further substantial policy measures to limit the damage from the Covid-19 lockdown and maintain financial stability. Nonetheless, at Jackson Hole the Federal Reserve yet again produced a big announcement.

Fed chair Jerome Powell unveiled a new policy "framework" amounting to Average Inflation Targeting (AIT), whereby it "seeks to achieve inflation that averages 2 per cent over time". This means that the Fed will allow inflation to run above 2 per cent to make up for periods where inflation is below 2 per cent. There was little detail on how this will be achieved, with Mr Powell describing the approach as flexible rather than being tied to a mathematical formula.

How significant is the Fed's move to average inflation targeting?

Since the 2007-2008 Global Financial Crisis, central banks have implemented unprecedented policies. Interest rates have been slashed, in some cases to near zero, and they have engaged in printing money in order to buy bonds and other assets, otherwise known as quantitative easing.

Your feedback is important to us

Tell us what you think. Email us at btuserfeedback@sph.com.sg

The global economy has seen some notable developments during this phase. US unemployment hovered at 50-year lows for two years prior to Covid-19.

The US economy saw its longest ever period of growth. In one sense then, policy did its job of ensuring price stability, full employment and economic growth.

But, despite this expansion and low unemployment, amid loose policy measures, inflation has remained below target and the Federal Reserve has reduced its expectations for growth markedly.

There are numerous reasons for persistently low inflation, but it seems fair to say that the current policy framework has reached its limit in respect of precipitating higher growth or inflation.

Mr Powell's speech acknowledged that stable prices are desirable for a well-functioning economy, but raised concerns of "an adverse cycle of ever-lower inflation and inflation expectations". Japan's "lost decade" of deflation from 1991-2001 is testament to this risk.

The economist's view

Keith Wade, Schroders chief economist said: "Although widely anticipated, the Fed's move is significant. It's an implicit acknowledgement that policy has been too tight and inflation too low for too long. This is an attempt to correct that."

"Since the financial crisis low interest rates have not been as powerful as households have focused on reducing debt and lenders have been more cautious."

Low interest rates could encourage governments to be more aggressive on the fiscal front (increasing public sending) which could create more demand and inflation, Mr Wade explains. "The change in Fed target may well push inflation expectations up, prompting workers to push for higher wages, which would potentially shift inflation too. At present though, the ability of workers to do this is low."

How could this affect bond markets?

The initial market response has seen a "bear steepening" move in the US yield curve, where yields on longer maturity bonds rise more than yields on shorter maturity bonds. For August, the yield on US Treasuries maturing in 30 years rose from 1.20 per cent to 1.45 per cent.

This essentially indicates markets expect rates will be higher over the longer term as growth and inflation picks up, which is the intention of the Fed's policy.

The bond fund manager's view

Lisa Hornby, Schroders' US fixed income portfolio manager says: "The odds that long-dated yields continue to rise more than yields on short-dated bonds is quite high."

"I see four key factors for this:

1) record Treasury issuance (that could be more skewed to the long end);

2) a demand gap where the new supply of bonds rises faster than the level of demand in the market;

3) the Fed's new policy of inflation targeting (which means they won't raise rates in anticipation of inflation but will wait until it happens); and

4) the Fed will only implement yield curve control (buying bonds in a targeted manner to keep yields low) as a last resort."

On the other hand, Mr Wade says: "Upward pressure on long-dated yields will likely only persist if inflation really begins to pick up. That might need more than loose monetary policy - help from other sources of stimulus like fiscal policy, through higher public spending, would also be needed."

"The difference will be further out as policy will now stay loose for longer as growth recovers and the economy is allowed to 'run hot' for a period to try and generate higher inflation. Interest rates will stay lower for longer than under the previous framework."

Ms Hornby points out that as the 10-year Treasury has averaged a yield of about 2.2 per cent over the past 10 years, a return to this level would be a massive move from today's level of about 0.75 per cent. Investors positioned simply for lower rates and higher Treasury prices could be caught out.

  • The writer is investment writer for Schroders.

BT is now on Telegram!

For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes