Private-markets access for retail investors is mostly good – but with caveats
Investors should be cautious about factors such as the policing of funds’ marketing, disclosures and practices, as well as the advisory process
Add BT as a preferred source
[SINGAPORE] Allowing retail investors to allocate to private-market funds is surely a good thing. Higher returns are sorely needed for retirement portfolios.
But it warrants caution as well. The devil is in the details – in the policing of the funds’ marketing, disclosures and practices. And, there is the financial advisory process, which is crucial to a well-informed decision. Advisers would be giving recommendations on a complex asset with higher fees – which could be a potentially lucrative revenue stream. They must be held to a higher bar when advising on such assets.
On Mar 27, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) published a paper seeking feedback on a regulatory framework to allow private-market fund investments for retail investors. Access is currently limited to accredited investors, defined as those with net personal assets of more than S$2 million, or an annual income of S$300,000.
TRENDING NOW
Buyer for England striker Harry Kane’s former mansion must pay £3.4 million after abandoning deal
Ohmyhome Ltd sells real estate business for token US$1 due to poor business and continued losses
Malaysian tycoon Vincent Tan’s sell-downs point to pruning rather than an exit plan
What’s wrong with Orchard Road? Experts weigh in on the street’s cachet and its future
