WEALTH & INVESTING
·
SUBSCRIBERS

The insidious threats to central bank independence

Meddling politicians are mostly a thing of the past, but that is no reason for complacency

    • As central bankers’ footprints in markets grow in size, they find themselves making more decisions that are ultimately political in nature.
    • As central bankers’ footprints in markets grow in size, they find themselves making more decisions that are ultimately political in nature. PHOTO: Pixabay
    Published Fri, Dec 16, 2022 · 03:00 PM

    “JUST kick ’em up the rump a little.” That was how US President Richard Nixon advised Federal Reserve chairman Arthur Burns to persuade the rest of the central bank’s board to cut interest rates in 1971.

    Kicked or not, the central bankers complied. Cuts helped Nixon to re-election by boosting employment. They also contributed to double-digit inflation that would not be decisively tamed until Paul Volcker ran the Fed in the 1980s.

    On Dec 14, the Fed raised interest rates by another 0.5 percentage point; the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Bank of England (BOE) were expected to follow suit shortly after. Technocrats have spent the decades since Burns making Nixon-like meddling more difficult. An academic cottage industry is devoted to numerating and ranking central bankers’ independence. In 2020, there were more than 150 central banks classed as independent by the BOE’s count – some 90 more than in the 1970s. The ECB’s autonomy is guaranteed by treaty.

    Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services