In the long run, the index wins
Actively managed domestic funds trail market benchmarks: study
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
NEARLY anyone with money in the stock market since 2009 has benefited from the great bull market run. But compared with the overall market, most actively managed stock mutual funds haven't performed very well or very consistently.
Exactly how the funds stack up will depend on the precise measurements you use. If you use the definitions and updated results of a study that I reported on last month, actively managed stock funds as a group look quite weak. In fact, in the six years through March, they did worse than you would have expected if their managers had flipped coins instead of picking stocks.
That study, "Does Past Performance Matter? The Persistence Scorecard", by S&P Dow Jones Indices, asked whether good performance in one year persisted in the years that followed. It generally didn't. Not a single actively managed fund finished in the top quarter in each of the six years through March.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
Vietnam formalises new state leadership, redefining ‘four pillars’ power balance
‘Largest Singapore commercial S-Reit proxy’: analysts say buy CICT shares after Paragon acquisition
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
Why where you park your joint venture matters: Lessons from a US$689 million shareholder dispute