What a third world war would mean for investors
Global conflicts have a habit of sneaking up on money-managers
Add BT as a preferred source
EUROPE had been moving towards the slaughterhouse for years, and by 1914 a conflict was all but inevitable – that, at least, is the argument often made in hindsight. Yet at the time, as historian Niall Ferguson noted in a paper published in 2008, it did not feel that way to investors.
For them, the first world war came as a shock. Until the week before it erupted, prices in the bond, currency and money markets barely budged. Then all hell broke loose. “The City has seen in a flash the meaning of war,” wrote this newspaper on Aug 1, 1914.
Could financial markets once again be underpricing the risk of a global conflict? In the nightmare scenario, the descent into a third world war began two years ago, as Russian troops massed on the Ukrainian border. Today Israel’s battle against Hamas has the frightening potential to spill across its borders.
TRENDING NOW
DBS, OCBC and UOB shares hit all-time highs as sentiment improves
Targeted credit relief: Vietnam steers funding to Vingroup, Sun Group, Masterise megaprojects
E-commerce job cuts signal S-E Asia’s shift from scaling to deeper user engagement
Employers want AI-fluent employees. Hiring them is the challenge
