Why the famous 4% withdrawal rule for retirement may not be the answer
The modern economy is too dynamic to be governed by a fixed number derived from one country’s unique historical bull run
Add BT as a preferred source
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
SIMPLE ideas to address a complicated problem tend to have staying power. For decades, the 4 per cent rule has served as the anchor point for retirement planning, promising an easy and elegant solution to one of life’s most perplexing retirement puzzles: How much is enough?
The rule says a retiree can safely withdraw 4 per cent of their initial retirement portfolio, adjusted annually for inflation, for 30 years. This offers a gift of certainty.
But certainty is often the enemy of truth. The 4 per cent rule is not a timeless law of physics; it is predicated on a specific and exceptional time in American financial history. Relying on it today ignores the reality of the vastly different investment dynamics across time, geographies and even longevity.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
‘Boring’ is the new black: The stars are aligning for a Singapore stock market revival
Near sell-out launches in March boost developer sales to 1,300 units after four slow months
China pips the US if Asean is forced to choose, but analysts warn against reading it like a sports result
Genting Singapore’s Lim Kok Thay receives S$7.5 million pay package for FY2025
