Why the famous 4% withdrawal rule for retirement may not be the answer
The modern economy is too dynamic to be governed by a fixed number derived from one country’s unique historical bull run
Add BT as a preferred source
SIMPLE ideas to address a complicated problem tend to have staying power. For decades, the 4 per cent rule has served as the anchor point for retirement planning, promising an easy and elegant solution to one of life’s most perplexing retirement puzzles: How much is enough?
The rule says a retiree can safely withdraw 4 per cent of their initial retirement portfolio, adjusted annually for inflation, for 30 years. This offers a gift of certainty.
But certainty is often the enemy of truth. The 4 per cent rule is not a timeless law of physics; it is predicated on a specific and exceptional time in American financial history. Relying on it today ignores the reality of the vastly different investment dynamics across time, geographies and even longevity.
TRENDING NOW
CSE Global independent director quits after clashes with chairman Eugene Lai over board refresh
Cat A COE rate exceeds Cat B for third time in 4 months; premiums largely down
What’s wrong with Orchard Road? Experts weigh in on the street’s cachet and its future
Singapore workers experiencing rising anxiety; signs of fallout from pressure to use AI
