Weighing bank AT1 perps: Are you compensated enough for the risk?
Not all bank perpetuals are alike. Investors should get familiar with the loss-absorption mechanism of AT1 debt
A SWISS bank perpetual note was recently in our portfolio, and I was none the wiser on its inherent risks – until the unprecedented, total writedown of Credit Suisse’s entire 16 billion Swiss francs worth of perpetuals.
Our investment in UBS’ 5 per cent US dollar perp was called in January, a happy outcome since our holding was short. The decision to invest wasn’t entirely by chance: Interest rates rose sharply last year, but when we invested in mid-2022, the note’s duration was short with less than a year to go before the expected call date. If the issue hadn’t been called, a step-up interest rate would compensate for a longer holding period.
Would I invest in a bank perp again? Perhaps. But such notes’ outsized risks – relative to banks’ senior bonds – would now make me think twice or three times. I would certainly peruse the offer documents, which I hardly did with the UBS issue, our portfolio’s first bank perp investment.
TRENDING NOW
Grab CEO’s wife Chloe Tong on life with Anthony Tan and finding her purpose
Brokers maintain ‘buy’ on CDL despite investor reservations over strategic review
Deal between tycoon friends sparks scrutiny of Philippine power sector
Hwa Seng Builder, two China companies win S$1.2 billion Tuas Road Viaduct phase two contracts