The absurdity of ‘sovereign citizens’
IN SINGAPORE, there have been at least three recent legal cases where a defendant has claimed to be a “sovereign citizen”. This would supposedly let them be exempted from abiding by the laws of the land or respecting its courts.
These claims have received short shrift from a legal system that refuses to recognise any such status – with good reason.
The origins of the sovereign citizen idea lie in the Posse Comitatus, a far-right agglomeration of groups founded in the US in the late 1960s. A racist movement that was anti-Black and anti-Semitic, it claimed that Jews controlled and manipulated federal institutions and that only county-level elected government was legitimate.
KEYWORDS IN THIS ARTICLE
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Opinion & Features
Indonesia spices up the global interest rate debate
In the robot-driven Fifth Industrial Revolution, human-centric skills remain key
Why decarbonisation is so hard
Not just fun and games: How mobile games have become big business
As COP29 planning begins, reforms needed to fulfil Paris ambition
Markets are embracing India’s Modi for what he won’t do