The fiscal cost of quantitative easing
IN accumulating massive bond holdings over the course of a decade of quantitative easing (QE), central banks were effectively betting that interest rates would stay low indefinitely. They have lost that wager.
Economists agree: Central banks’ bond-buying programmes constitute a quasi-fiscal policy, as monetary authorities finance their purchases of long-term government bonds by issuing short-term reserves to commercial banks. Until recently, this seemed to be good business. While the bonds technically yielded little, the cost of financing was so low (-0.5 per cent in the eurozone, for example) that central banks reaped profits anyway.
But with inflation skyrocketing, reaching double-digit rates in many countries, central banks have had little choice but to increase their policy rates rapidly. This has raised the costs of financing, with short-term rates now exceeding long-term bond yields. As a result, the fiscal risks of bond-buying programmes are being realised, with central banks facing losses on their holdings.
KEYWORDS IN THIS ARTICLE
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
Without a game changer, Sentosa Cove condos will continue underperforming
Relative measures can be absolutely wrong
If the US economy is robust, why is the yield curve still inverted?
ST Engineering focuses on synergies from US$2.7 billion acquisition to reach greater heights
‘Competition for talent’ a poor excuse to keep key executives’ pay under wraps
OCBC should put its properties into a Reit and distribute the trust’s units to shareholders