The Federal Reserve’s US$2.5 trillion question
Whether quantitative tightening – which isn’t merely the reverse of quantitative easing – will work gets to the heart of modern monetary policy.
CAN A central bank make US$2.5trn of cash vanish without anyone much noticing? That is the improbable, even audacious, mission the Federal Reserve has begun, trying to shrink its vast balance-sheet while minimising disturbances to the economy. The process—known as “quantitative tightening” (QT)—got under way in mid-2022. The Fed has already shed nearly US$500bn in assets, a good first step. But recent ripples in the banking system hint at turbulence ahead. Some analysts and investors think these strains will ultimately force the Fed to call off QT well ahead of schedule. Others suspect that the central bank still has time, and tools, on its side.
It may sound like a technical and arcane debate. It is most certainly complex. But it also gets to the heart of modern monetary policy. The Fed, like other central banks, has come to rely on quantitative easing (QE)—purchasing assets, especially government bonds, on a giant scale—to calm financial markets and boost the economy during severe downturns. For QE to work in the future, QT must work now: expanding balance-sheets in bad times is only sustainable if they shrink in good times, otherwise they will ratchet ever higher.
Since the global financial crisis of 2007-9 the Fed has resorted to QE on four occasions, yielding a body of research about how it works. In contrast, the Fed has employed QT just once, from late 2017 to 2019, stopping early after the money market started to buckle. There is thus a lot of uncertainty about its consequences.
KEYWORDS IN THIS ARTICLE
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Opinion & Features
The Fed’s quantitative easing programme has cost too much
Without a game changer, Sentosa Cove condos will continue underperforming
Why China’s electric cars are piling up at European ports
Relative measures can be absolutely wrong
Why the potential for another Donald Trump presidency is making Iran very nervous
Iran-Israel strife throws out a lifeline to shippers