SUBSCRIBERS

Nine-year rule for IDs: A necessary but small step

Mandatory tenure limit for independent directors is but a blunt tool; many other areas of governance need to be strengthened to improve board effectiveness – the ultimate goal

Mak Yuen Teen
Published Mon, Jan 16, 2023 · 02:03 PM

THE introduction of a mandatory nine-year tenure limit for independent directors (IDs) by the Singapore Exchange (SGX) adds the Republic to the list of markets with a mandatory limit.

In Malaysia, a mandatory 12-year limit comes into effect in June this year, with IDs who have served 12 years or more having to resign or be re-designated by Jun 1, 2023. An annual two-tier vote remains in place under the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance 2021, for IDs who have served more than nine years and less than 12 years. Clearly, Malaysia, which introduced two-tier vote for IDs before Singapore, has – like Singapore – decided that the two-tier vote is not sufficient for improving board independence and renewal. SGX will revoke the two-tier vote immediately.

Singapore has a longstanding issue with IDs who simply would not leave. A 2015 study by me and Chew Yi Hong found that the longest tenure for an ID was 45 years, followed by two who had served for 33 and 32 years. One ID had served a cumulative tenure of 96 years on his four boards, and another served 80 years on four boards.

KEYWORDS IN THIS ARTICLE

READ MORE

BT is now on Telegram!

For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to  t.me/BizTimes

Opinion & Features

SUPPORT SOUTH-EAST ASIA'S LEADING FINANCIAL DAILY

Get the latest coverage and full access to all BT premium content.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Browse corporate subscription here