Stock market trading – faster and cheaper is not necessarily better
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
BETWEEN 1992 and 1999 US space agency Nasa adopted the mission paradigm of “faster, better, cheaper’’ (FBC) for its unmanned missions. Sceptics pointed out that FBC was too ambitious and that perhaps only two out of the three were achievable – for instance, a mission could be launched faster and cheaper but not necessarily better, or it could be faster and better but not cheaper.
After five failed missions and one cancellation – four of which occurred in 1999 alone – sceptics were proven right and FBC was discontinued.
Coincidentally, in 1999, stockbroking commissions in Singapore started on the path towards full liberalisation in 2003, with the promise that, over time, technological advancements would mean faster and cheaper trade execution, thus leaving retail investors better off.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
Higher costs, lower returns: Why are Singaporeans still betting on real estate?
South-east Asian markets account for 8.8% of global capital inflows from 2021 to 2024: report
Richard Eu on how core values, customers keep Singapore’s TCM chain Eu Yan Sang relevant