The absurdity of ‘sovereign citizens’
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
IN SINGAPORE, there have been at least three recent legal cases where a defendant has claimed to be a “sovereign citizen”. This would supposedly let them be exempted from abiding by the laws of the land or respecting its courts.
These claims have received short shrift from a legal system that refuses to recognise any such status – with good reason.
The origins of the sovereign citizen idea lie in the Posse Comitatus, a far-right agglomeration of groups founded in the US in the late 1960s. A racist movement that was anti-Black and anti-Semitic, it claimed that Jews controlled and manipulated federal institutions and that only county-level elected government was legitimate.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
Air India asks Tata, Singapore Airlines for funds after US$2.4 billion loss
‘Boring’ is the new black: The stars are aligning for a Singapore stock market revival
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
South-east Asian markets account for 8.8% of global capital inflows from 2021 to 2024: report