International trade strengthens, not weakens, countries’ resilience
From energy security and transport bottlenecks to infant formula, it’s a fallacy that countries would have been less exposed to recent supply shocks had they been more self-sufficient.
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
ATHENS – Leading economies have been afflicted with new problems over the past year. The United States is struggling with both supply-chain blockages and a critical shortage of baby formula. The European Union faces the threat of scarce energy supplies, owing to sanctions on Russian fossil-fuel exports. And almost all countries are experiencing high inflation.
Some have blamed these problems on excessive dependence on international trade, that is, globalisation. Deglobalisation, fragmentation, reshoring, friend-shoring, decoupling, and resilience have become now-familiar buzzwords. There is a widespread sentiment that individual countries would have been less exposed to recent shocks had they been more self-sufficient.
The argument goes beyond observing that supply chains generate diminishing returns for private firms. Government policies that economists label as protectionist have gained political support – beginning, notably, with then-US President Donald Trump’s trade war in 2018. The impression is that trade barriers could help protect us all.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
Higher costs, lower returns: Why are Singaporeans still betting on real estate?
South-east Asian markets account for 8.8% of global capital inflows from 2021 to 2024: report
Richard Eu on how core values, customers keep Singapore’s TCM chain Eu Yan Sang relevant