Delisting plans by Golden Energy, Boustead Projects a test of SGX’s rules, stated views
SGX’s letter to Golden Energy is a template of sorts for proactively responding to unsatisfactory delisting proposals
THIS column highlighted three weeks ago questions raised by a shareholder of Golden Energy and Resources (Gear) about the manner in which the company’s appointed independent financial adviser (IFA) had been asked to opine on its proposed break-up and delisting.
Four days later, the Singapore Exchange (SGX) read the riot act to Gear’s board and appointed advisers. In a letter dated Feb 24, SGX reminded the company to ensure its IFA’s opinion states specifically whether the “all cash” consideration of S$0.846 is fair and reasonable.
SGX also instructed Gear to ensure its IFA – a firm called W Capital Markets – takes into account material changes to the traded price of its component assets. This appears to be a reference to the soaring market value of Australia-listed Stanmore Resources, in which Gear holds a 64 per cent stake.
TRENDING NOW
Employers want AI-fluent employees. Hiring them is the challenge
Early payout from Philippines’ Maharlika Investment Fund raises eyebrows over its true nature
SpaceX, Unitree, Anthropic, OpenAI: Is the ultra-hyped tech-listing wave backed by sound fundamentals?
Changes to EV incentives, uncertainty over COE framework drive Category A premium to a new high in ‘re-run of 2025 mania’