Delisting plans by Golden Energy, Boustead Projects a test of SGX’s rules, stated views
SGX’s letter to Golden Energy is a template of sorts for proactively responding to unsatisfactory delisting proposals
THIS column highlighted three weeks ago questions raised by a shareholder of Golden Energy and Resources (Gear) about the manner in which the company’s appointed independent financial adviser (IFA) had been asked to opine on its proposed break-up and delisting.
Four days later, the Singapore Exchange (SGX) read the riot act to Gear’s board and appointed advisers. In a letter dated Feb 24, SGX reminded the company to ensure its IFA’s opinion states specifically whether the “all cash” consideration of S$0.846 is fair and reasonable.
SGX also instructed Gear to ensure its IFA – a firm called W Capital Markets – takes into account material changes to the traded price of its component assets. This appears to be a reference to the soaring market value of Australia-listed Stanmore Resources, in which Gear holds a 64 per cent stake.
TRENDING NOW
On the board but frozen out: The Taib family feud tearing Sarawak construction giant apart
Thai and Vietnamese farmers may stop planting rice because of the Iran war. Here’s why
MAS convenes bank CEOs over AI cyberthreats; boards told to own risks, not leave to IT teams
Is it time to scrap COE categories for cars?