The election-devaluation cycle
Recent experiences in Nigeria, Turkey, Argentina, Egypt, and Indonesia seem to bear out the idea that developing economies might seek to prop up their currencies before a vote
[CAMBRIDGE] The proposition that major currency devaluations are more likely to come immediately after, rather than before, an election is being tested anew. In the biggest voting year in history, the implications could be far-reaching.
Economists will recall the Nobel laureate economist William D Nordhaus’ influential 1975 paper The Political Business Cycle. According to him, in the year leading up to an election, governments are more inclined to pursue fiscal and monetary expansion. The idea is that accelerating output and employment growth will boost the incumbent’s popularity before the election, with the Bill – in terms of debt troubles and inflation – coming due only after the vote.
But Nordhaus’ seminal paper also predicted a political foreign-exchange cycle. Emerging-market and developing economies, Nordhaus suggested, might seek to prop up the value of their currencies before an election, even if it means spending down their foreign-exchange reserves, only to undergo a devaluation soon after.
TRENDING NOW
On the board but frozen out: The Taib family feud tearing Sarawak construction giant apart
Thai and Vietnamese farmers may stop planting rice because of the Iran war. Here’s why
US-China rivalry and the Kindleberger Trap: Why inaction – not escalation – is the biggest risk
PayPal plans job cuts as its new CEO pursues turnaround strategy