Geopolitics meets geoeconomics
Debate over debt at the IMF reflects rift between China and the West
“THE fragmentation of capital flows along geopolitical fault-lines and the potential emergence of regional geopolitical blocs could have large negative spillovers to the global economy,” International Monetary Fund (IMF) researchers concluded in a paper issued on the eve of the IMF-World Bank spring meetings last week (Apr 10-16).
Indeed, as finance ministers and central bank heads gathered in Washington, DC, it was becoming clear against the backdrop of a growing Sino-American rift how difficult it would be to stabilise the global economy at a time when the pressure to decouple their economies affects key industries, such as high technology.
At the same time, cross-border investment flows now seem to reflect geopolitical alignments. Rival economic blocs have emerged to replace the integrated global market of the post-Cold War era of globalisation, which was rooted in turn in the Bretton Woods system, established after World War II. The goal of Bretton Woods was to establish macroeconomic stability on the basis of Western capitalist principles.
TRENDING NOW
Malaysian tycoon Vincent Tan’s sell-downs point to pruning rather than an exit plan
Simba ordered to pay S$700,000 in damages to indoor skydiving operator Altitude Xperience for trespass
What’s wrong with Orchard Road? Experts weigh in on the street’s cachet and its future
As luxury retail goes big, can Singapore’s Orchard Road keep up?