While creatives fight AI, fashion may profit from its ‘negative space’
In a world demanding protection from GenAI, fashion’s low-IP zone offers some surprising lessons
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
EVERY week, we read about authors and artists in copyright lawsuits against companies behind generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) applications such as ChatGPT and Midjourney. Presently, there are about 50 ongoing lawsuits globally claiming that the use of copyrighted works such as literary texts, paintings and photographs to train GenAI are illegal, or that the outputs produced are substantially similar to the originals, and hence have a substitutive impact on these works.
The clarion call by the creators urges for stronger copyright enforcement. The fashion industry, however, presents a striking paradox: This global powerhouse, with a projected revenue of US$1.7 trillion in 2025, has long thrived in the face of weaker copyright laws.
Copyright’s “negative space” is an area where creation and innovation can thrive without significant protection from the law. In this negative space, creators are not exclusively motivated or incentivised by the prospect of intellectual property (IP) protection.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
Air India asks Tata, Singapore Airlines for funds after US$2.4 billion loss
Beijing’s calculated silence on the Iran war
China pips the US if Asean is forced to choose, but analysts warn against reading it like a sports result
Richard Eu on how core values, customers keep Singapore’s TCM chain Eu Yan Sang relevant