While creatives fight AI, fashion may profit from its ‘negative space’
In a world demanding protection from GenAI, fashion’s low-IP zone offers some surprising lessons
EVERY week, we read about authors and artists in copyright lawsuits against companies behind generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) applications such as ChatGPT and Midjourney. Presently, there are about 50 ongoing lawsuits globally claiming that the use of copyrighted works such as literary texts, paintings and photographs to train GenAI are illegal, or that the outputs produced are substantially similar to the originals, and hence have a substitutive impact on these works.
The clarion call by the creators urges for stronger copyright enforcement. The fashion industry, however, presents a striking paradox: This global powerhouse, with a projected revenue of US$1.7 trillion in 2025, has long thrived in the face of weaker copyright laws.
Copyright’s “negative space” is an area where creation and innovation can thrive without significant protection from the law. In this negative space, creators are not exclusively motivated or incentivised by the prospect of intellectual property (IP) protection.
TRENDING NOW
Once staunchly pro-China, Malaysian Chinese businesses are now distancing themselves from Beijing
Britain’s mansion tax shows the difficulty of targeting wealth
Three hats, one goal: How Ng Kian Swan runs sustainability at NUHS
COE review: The gap between luxury and mass-market cars isn’t the only one worth bridging