Why my recession rule could go wrong this time
The highly accurate Sahm rule uses the unemployment rate to detect the start of an economic downturn. But like many indicators during the pandemic era, it’s possible it could ‘break’.
Add BT as a preferred source
ALARM bells sounded Friday (Nov 3) when we learnt that the unemployment rate in the United States rose to 3.9 per cent for October, well above the 50-year low of 3.4 per cent that it hit earlier in the year. The latest reading is still very low, so what’s with the doomsayers telling us a recession has arrived?
Relatively small increases in the unemployment rate, even starting from low levels, typically signal a recession. Where we are now is insufficient to make that call, but it’s worrisome.
How do I know? Before the pandemic, I developed a highly accurate recession indicator, later named the Sahm rule. It would have triggered early in every recession since 1970. But it has not triggered now.
TRENDING NOW
On the board but frozen out: The Taib family feud tearing Sarawak construction giant apart
Thai and Vietnamese farmers may stop planting rice because of the Iran war. Here’s why
Are Keppel’s dividends truly unsustainable – or just misunderstood?
COEs for large cars up 4.3% at S$126,236, mainstream cars near S$125,000
