Why my recession rule could go wrong this time
The highly accurate Sahm rule uses the unemployment rate to detect the start of an economic downturn. But like many indicators during the pandemic era, it’s possible it could ‘break’.
Add BT as a preferred source
ALARM bells sounded Friday (Nov 3) when we learnt that the unemployment rate in the United States rose to 3.9 per cent for October, well above the 50-year low of 3.4 per cent that it hit earlier in the year. The latest reading is still very low, so what’s with the doomsayers telling us a recession has arrived?
Relatively small increases in the unemployment rate, even starting from low levels, typically signal a recession. Where we are now is insufficient to make that call, but it’s worrisome.
How do I know? Before the pandemic, I developed a highly accurate recession indicator, later named the Sahm rule. It would have triggered early in every recession since 1970. But it has not triggered now.
TRENDING NOW
Singapore’s new data centres must use renewables. Can they overcome the hurdles?
PM Wong wants more private-sector leaders like Tan See Leng in Cabinet amid succession challenge
Dolly Parton’s former California retreat returns to the market
Will the US-Canada tariff war irrevocably damage bilateral ties?
