Tempted by ‘safe’ assets in times of uncertainty? Think again
Downside protection using so-called safe-haven assets has been far from consistent, a study has found
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
GEOPOLITICAL events seem unprecedented because they are largely unpredictable, and the factors that trigger them rarely happen in the same way twice.
But this is consistent – tensions and uncertainties always prompt plentiful bets on which investments are “safe”, and which are not.
Traditionally, US 10-year Treasuries, the US dollar, and selective commodities such as gold and oil, are considered safe-haven assets. Gold, in particular, has a reputation as a store of value. In times of geopolitical instability, when the value of paper currency and other financial instruments can be volatile, gold is perceived to have a stable intrinsic value.
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
Middle East-linked energy supply shocks put Asean Power Grid back in focus
Beijing’s calculated silence on the Iran war
DPM Gan warns of 3 structural shifts to the global system that will bring greater challenges – and opportunities