How scary are synthetic risk transfers?
The scepticism about them is a form of post-traumatic stress from the financial crisis; the moral hazard today is lower than before 2008
Add BT as a preferred source
SYNTHETIC risk transfers (SRTs) have recently started raising eyebrows. First introduced in Europe in the early 2000s as a niche form of regulatory capital optimisation, they have since evolved into one of the most important tools in modern bank balance sheet management.
Since 2016, banks have executed SRTs referencing more than US$1.1 trillion in underlying assets, with annual issuance worth tens of billions of dollars. As activity has climbed, and as private credit funds eagerly absorbed the contracts, regulators and financial journalists have grown increasingly vocal about their concerns.
The question is whether this scrutiny is warranted.
TRENDING NOW
Singapore Kitchen CEO, senior manager charged with alleged fraud, falsifying accounts; both to stay in jobs for now
Profit with purpose: Kim Choo Kueh Chang’s pivot from public listing to protecting heritage
Who would buy Vietnam’s state-owned stakes – when Hanoi is ready to sell?
HSBC, AIA, Prudential shares slide after report of Hong Kong bank account curbs
