US needs to address 'corporate inversion'
The existing corporate tax code, particularly the 35% corporate rate, is why American companies engage in the schemes
Washington
NO one would suggest that Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders - the socialist who beat former secretary of state Hillary Clinton by a 13-point margin in the Democratic presidential primary in Wisconsin last Tuesday - or that the electoral success of the current Republican presidential frontrunner, the nationalist Donald Trump, were responsible for the decision by pharmaceutical giant Pfizer to call off a US$152 billion merger with the Dublin-based Allergan last week.
But there is no doubt that the willingness on the part of President Barack Obama to challenge and successfully scuttle a plan by another American company to move its operations overseas in order to avoid US taxes is a reflection of the dramatic change in the political environment in Washington.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
‘Competition for talent’ a poor excuse to keep key executives’ pay under wraps
OCBC should put its properties into a Reit and distribute the trust’s units to shareholders
Why a stronger US dollar is dangerous
An overstimulated US economy is asking for trouble
Too many property agents? Cap commissions on home sales
Time to study broadening of private market access