Getting desired aims in exec compensation
Successful models must balance pay-for-performance principles and economic arguments with execs' emotions and perceptions.
CONVENTIONAL executive compensation models are built on certain universally accepted principles. For example, a large portion of pay should be at risk, leveraged incentives drive executives to perform better; and performance-based long-term incentives (LTI) help retain key talent.
While these pay-for-performance principles are quite robust and defensible to shareholders, we should ask if they have achieved the desired objectives of driving performance and productivity improvements, differentiating reward outcomes among executives, and motivating and retaining key executives.
Are we paying more for less?
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Companies & Markets
Porsche posts Q1 profit drop on ramp-up costs
IBM plots US$730 million expansion of Canadian semiconductor site
Seatrium unit to fully redeem S$500 million worth of floating-rate bonds early
Yeo Guat Kwang, John Chen retiring from corporate boards
US: Wall St opens higher
Air China orders homegrown C919s in challenge to jet duopoly