You are here

Trump says report on trade deal with China 'completely wrong'

His latest tweet sends US stocks falling

Vocal China hawk and Republican Senator Marco Rubio says Washington should consider the risks of a deal. He said a near-term pact "would give away the tariff leverage needed for a broader agreement on issues".


US President Donald Trump on Friday said a Wall Street Journal story on a US trade deal with China is completely wrong.

"The Wall Street Journal story on the China Deal is completely wrong, especially their statement on Tariffs," Mr Trump wrote in a tweet, offering no specifics and not indicating which story he meant.

US stocks fell following his latest comments.

Market voices on:

It was earlier reported that Mr Trump had signed off on a phase one trade deal with China, averting the Dec 15 introduction of a new wave of US tariffs on about US$160 billion of consumer goods from the Asian nation, according to people familiar with the matter.

The deal, presented to Mr Trump by trade advisers on Thursday, included a promise by the Chinese to buy more US agricultural goods, according to the sources. Officials also discussed possible reductions of existing duties on Chinese products, they said. The terms have been agreed but the legal text has not yet been finalised, the sources said. A White House spokesperson declined to comment.

The administration has reached out to allies on Capitol Hill and in the business community to issue statements of support once the announcement is made, they said. Before meeting his trade advisers, Mr Trump engaged with members of the Business Roundtable, which represents some of the largest US companies, sources said.

Global stocks hit a record high and bond yields climbed on optimism over trade. On Thursday, Mr Trump tweeted that the US and China are "VERY close" to signing a "BIG" trade deal, also sending equities higher. The yuan surged the most in a year. "They want it, and so do we!" he tweeted five minutes after equity markets opened in New York, sending stocks to new records.

Mr Trump changed his mind on deals with China before. Negotiators have been working on the terms of the phase one deal for months after the president announced in October that the two nations had reached an agreement that could be put on paper within weeks.

The US has added a 25 per cent duty on about US$250 billion of Chinese products, and a 15 per cent levy on another US$110 billion of its imports over the course of a roughly 20-month trade war. Discussions now are focused on reducing those rates by as much as half, as part of the interim agreement that Mr Trump announced almost nine weeks ago.

In addition to a significant increase in Chinese agricultural purchases in exchange for tariff relief, officials have also said a phase one pact would include Chinese commitments to do more to stop intellectual property theft and an agreement by both sides not to manipulate their currencies. Put off for later discussions are knotty issues such as longstanding US complaints over the vast web of subsidies ranging from cheap electricity to low-cost loans that China has used to build its industrial might.

The new duties, which are scheduled to take effect at 12.01 am Washington time on Sunday unless the administration says otherwise, would hit consumer goods from China including smartphones and toys.

Mr Trump's advisers had sent conflicting signals and stressed that he had not made up his mind on the next steps. The decisions facing Mr Trump over a trade deal highlight one dilemma that he confronts going into the 2020 election: Whether to bet on an escalation of hostilities with China and the tariffs he is so fond of, or to follow the advice of more market-oriented advisers and business leaders who argue that a pause in the escalation would help a slowing US economy bounce back in an election year.

The president's expected announcement on Thursday was met with immediate criticism from Democrats and even by members of his own party. Republican Senator Marco Rubio, one of the most vocal China hawks in Congress, said the White House should consider the risks of a deal.

A near-term pact "would give away the tariff leverage needed for a broader agreement on the issues that matter the most - such as subsidies to domestic firms, forced tech transfers & blocking US firms access to key sectors", he said in a tweet.. BLOOMBERG