Live Twitter debates: Some dos and don'ts
Opening up floor to public may not always favour the firm hosting the discussion
AN increasing number of companies are taking to social media in an attempt to engage consumers on a more personal level. This provides a platform for two-way conversation between consumers and companies, and allows for topical live debates through their social media channels.
Giving consumers the ability to directly discuss problems and issues they may have with certain companies can help in building strong consumer relations, but it can also leave companies vulnerable to negativity. Opening up a firm to a level of public scrutiny that cannot be controlled may not always favour the firm hosting the debate.
Recently, JP Morgan opened up a live Twitter debate with one of its star investment bankers under the hashtag #AskJPM. The firm was hoping to engage the next wave of enthusiastic investment bankers with useful career advice. Instead, Twitter users took the opportunity to publicly shame the company with a barrage of jokes and abuse. JP Morgan's official response to this was "#Badidea! Back to the drawing board!"
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Technology
Meta’s results are best viewed through rose-tinted AI glasses
'Harvesting data': Latin American AI startups transform farming
After long peace, Big Tech faces US antitrust reckoning
Tech’s cash crunch sees creditors turn ‘violent’ with one another
Tech millionaires chase billionaire tax shields with ‘swap fund’
Elon Musk’s Starlink profits are more elusive than investors think