Planet on the ballot
WE now have a pretty good idea who will be on the ballot in November: Hillary Clinton, almost surely (after the South Carolina blowout, prediction markets give her a 96 per cent probability of securing her party's nomination), and Donald Trump, with high likelihood (currently 80 per cent probability on the markets). But even if there's a stunning upset in what's left of the primaries, we already know very well what will be at stake - namely, the fate of the planet.
Why do I say this?
Obviously, the partisan divide on environmental policy has been growing ever wider. Just eight years ago, the GOP-nominated John McCain, whose platform included a call for a "cap-and-trade" system - that is, a system that restricts emissions, but allows pollution permits to be bought and sold - to limit greenhouse gases. Since then, however, denial of climate science and opposition to anything that might avert catastrophe have become essential pillars of the Republican identity. So the choice in 2016 is starker than ever before.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
The trillion-dollar AI arms race
Next-gen AI PCs will redefine work in the age of intelligence
Please stop making tipping more awkward
The future of robots is coming on two legs
The long, slow decline in fund manager fees may be ending
Investors should not tear up their playbooks over geopolitical risks