Pimco fees come under scrutiny
A debate has arisen over what the US bond giant's total return fund charges investors to oversee and administer its assets
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
WITH the trading desks of investment banks cut to the bone, the ability to pin a fat fee on a fast-growing pile of assets has become the holy grail for financial firms.
Few have proved better at this than the bond giant Pimco and its total return fund, which took in more than US$6 billion in fees between 2010 and 2013 - the most profitable run ever for a mutual fund.
But as Pimco copes with an exodus of cash from its largest fund after the departure of its co-founder William Gross, these fees - and in particular, their composition - are drawing scrutiny.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
Middle East-linked energy supply shocks put Asean Power Grid back in focus
Beijing’s calculated silence on the Iran war
DPM Gan warns of 3 structural shifts to the global system that will bring greater challenges – and opportunities