Apple kicking out apps that fight iPhone addiction

San Francisco

THEY all tell a similar story: they ran apps that helped people limit the time they and their children spent on iPhones. Then Apple created its own screen-time tracker. And then Apple made staying in business very, very difficult.

Over the past year, Apple has removed or restricted at least 11 of the 17 most downloaded screen-time and parental-control apps, according to an analysis by The New York Times and Sensor Tower, an app-data firm. Apple has also clamped down on a number of lesser-known apps.

In some cases, Apple forced companies to remove features that allowed parents to control their children's devices or that blocked children's access to certain apps and adult content.

In other cases, it simply pulled the apps from its App Store.

Some app makers with thousands of paying customers have shut down. Most others say their futures are in jeopardy.

"They yanked us out of the blue with no warning," said Amir Moussavian, chief executive of OurPact, the top parental-control iPhone app, with more than three million downloads. In February, Apple pulled the app, which accounted for 80 per cent of OurPact's revenue, from its App Store. "They are systematically killing the industry," Mr Moussavian added.

The screen-time app makers are the latest companies to suddenly find themselves both competing against Apple and at the mercy of the tech titan. By controlling the iPhone App Store, where companies find some of their most lucrative customers, Apple has unusual power over the fortunes of other corporations.

Executives at the app makers believe they are being targeted because their apps could hurt Apple's business. Apple's tools, they add, aren't as aggressive about limiting screen time and don't provide as many options.

"Their incentives aren't really aligned for helping people solve their problem," said Fred Stutzman, chief executive of Freedom, a screen-time app with more than 770,000 downloads before Apple removed it in August. "Can you really trust that Apple wants people to spend less time on their phones?"

Tim Cook, Apple's chief executive, said at a conference this month that Apple had added screen-time tools to help people monitor and manage their phone use. "We don't want people using their phones all the time," he said. "This has never been an objective for us."

On Thursday, two of the most popular parental-control apps, Kidslox and Qustodio, filed a complaint with the European Union's competition office. Kidslox said business had plummeted since Apple forced changes to its app that made it less useful than Apple's tool.

Apple is facing other accusations that it is abusing its dominant position to lift itself and bury rivals - an issue that has become more important as the iPhone maker expands into new markets like television, news and gaming.

Spotify complained to European regulators last month that Apple used the App Store to give its Apple Music service an unfair advantage over Spotify's competing app.

Dutch regulators announced this month that they would investigate whether Apple abused its control of the App Store.

In the United States, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, a Democratic candidate for president, recently suggested separating the App Store from Apple as part of her proposal to rein in the American tech giants.

The app makers said they were most frustrated by the process of meeting Apple's sudden demands. In many cases, Apple alerted them that their apps would be removed - and their businesses crippled - via a short note, according to correspondence viewed by The New York Times.

When app makers asked for more information, responses were often perfunctory and slow in coming.

"As a developer who's been on the App Store for 10 years, I would expect some courtesy from Apple of at least a phone call to explain what we're doing wrong," said Suren Ramasubbu, the head of Mobicip, a parental-control app that had about 2.5 million downloads this year, about 70 per cent of them on iPhones.

On Jan 19, Mr Ramasubbu received a message from Apple that said he had 30 days to change the Mobicip app or it would be removed from the App Store.

"If you have any questions about this information, please reply to this message to let us know," the note said. "Best regards, App Store Review."

Over the next 27 days, Mr Ramasubbu responded four times seeking more information. He eventually resubmitted the app with changes he hoped would satisfy Apple's demands.

Then, with Mobicip's deadline just a few days away, Apple responded three times to his earlier detailed questions - with virtually the same message: "Your app uses public APIs in an unapproved manner, which does not comply with guideline 2.5.1 of the App Store Review Guidelines."

"We hear you loud and clear," Mr Ramasubbu responded on the morning of Feb 19, Apple's deadline. He begged for answers: could Apple tell him what he needed to do to keep Mobicip on iPhones?

"Any general direction, clue or specific guidance will be deeply appreciated. We have been one of the pioneers among parental control apps on the App Store over 10 long years and have always been playing by the rules," he wrote. "Please point us in the right direction and we can take it from there."

Five hours later, Apple responded with a 14-word message: "Your app has an unresolved issue and has been removed from the App Store."

"No reason, no detail," Mr Ramasubbu added. "Suddenly we don't have a business anymore." NYTIMES