THE US Federal Reserve’s top bank watchdog said crypto stablecoins could amount to private money that might be destabilising for the US financial system if left unchecked.

“There is interest in strong, federal regulation of stablecoins that makes sure the Federal Reserve can approve, regulate and enforce against stablecoin issuers, including wallets,” Michael Barr, vice chair for supervision, told attendees on Tuesday (Nov 7) at the DC Fintech Week event.

Barr was reiterating the central bank’s concern about private-industry crypto tokens pegged to assets such as the US dollar and their potential to disrupt the broader financial world. “We need a strong framework,” he said. “It’s better if Congress can decide the rules of the road.”

The Fed continues to study technologies that would underlie a digital currency backed by the central bank, Barr told the audience. He previously said the Fed would not move ahead without consent from Congress and the executive branch.

Meanwhile, Nellie Liang, the undersecretary for domestic finance at the Treasury Department, said at the event that it’s “hard to say” what role unbacked cryptocurrencies and stablecoins will play in the financial system going forward.

Liang did, however, said she sees a use case for distributed ledger technology, in general. “The potential for that to bring efficiencies to payment and settlement seems pretty high,” Liang said.

GET BT IN YOUR INBOX DAILY

Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.

Sign UpVIEW ALL

Barr, who as a Fed governor votes on monetary policy, said the agency remains committed to taming US inflation. “It is really critical that we continue to do the work necessary to make sure we get inflation down to 2 per cent,” he said.

Another top banking regulator, Michael Hsu, the acting comptroller of the currency, made a distinction between crypto, which he said is plagued by chicanery, and tokenization, which promises genuine efficiencies.

Problem solver

While the crypto world is retail-oriented, largely driven by the hope of making some money, Hsu said “it still remains replete with fraud, scams and hacks, and some of the largest players remain unregulated.”

Tokenization, by contrast, is focused on solving an actual problem in finance, particularly with settlements. “There’s risk, there’s friction, there’s fees” in current set-ups, Hsu said in an interview with Bloomberg Television’s Romaine Bostick at the Washington event. “Tokenization holds the promise. It simplifies if it’s done right.”

As for bank stability, Hsu said investors need not worry about the vulnerabilities that led to the industry’s March convulsions, because his agency has stepped up supervision. BLOOMBERG