You are here

Sub-zero interest rates are luring insurers to risk

Regulators and economists warn that European insurance companies are among the market players most at risk of a meltdown because of all the negative-interest-rate debt

The quandary for insurers is that fewer and fewer bonds - generally safe investments - pay a positive interest rate.

Allianz chief risk officer Tom Wilson worries about what will happen if there is a shock to the financial system that causes government and corporate debt to abruptly lose value.


IT WAS a crisp autumn morning and Tom Wilson was contemplating the latest sign that the world of finance had turned upside down.

Greece had just sold bonds with a negative interest rate. It was the most recent example of how policies that revived growth after the last financial crisis have forced investors to effectively pay governments to assume custody of their money.

The amount of this kind of debt has soared in recent years and now exceeds US$17 trillion.

Market voices on:

"Maybe I'm old school, but it just feels weird," said Mr Wilson, the chief risk officer of German insurer Allianz. "It feels bizarre to have negative interest rates."

It is more than bizarre. A growing number of economists, regulators and former central bankers are warning that European insurance companies - traditionally some of the most strait-laced of investors - are among the market players most at risk of a meltdown because of all the negative-interest-rate debt.

Insurers make money by investing the billions they collect in policy makers' premiums. As they hunt for a return, any return, some companies are venturing into ever-riskier assets.

Search for yield

For the people who manage these billions, said Brian Coulton, chief economist of the debt ratings firm Fitch, "there has been a need to take on more risk". The so-called search for yield among investors has broad implications, creating demand and driving up prices for real estate, low-rated corporate debt and other risky assets; generating bubbles; and potentially setting the stage for the next financial crisis. Europe has more of this debt than any other region.

The impact on the insurance industry is drawing increasing concern. Last year, regulators conducted tests to see what would happen if rates spiked suddenly: Six of 42 large insurers would suffer losses large enough to drain their capital below legal thresholds, the tests found.

Insurers would probably be able to manage gradual increases in rates, said Dimitris Zafeiris, the top risk expert at Europe's insurance regulator. But "if it happens quickly", he added, "it raises questions about the impact on financial stability".

Typically, insurers seek to earn a modest return while keeping the money safe in case it is needed to pay claims. European insurance companies were big buyers of bonds issued by countries like Germany or Switzerland that have impeccable credit histories.

But when the return on those super-safe bonds dwindled over the past decade, and then turned negative, insurers and other investors began buying riskier assets like corporate bonds rated BBB, or just above the level considered junk. A lot of money is at stake. Insurance companies in Europe collectively have assets of 11 trillion euros (S$16.5 trillion).

Recently, regulators have become especially concerned that insurers have been loading up on a kind of investment known as collateralised debt obligations (CLOs).

CLOs are mortgages and other loans that have been packaged into securities. They bear ominous similarities to the securities that helped cause the 2008 financial crisis.

Banks, pension funds and insurers may be underestimating the risk of CLOs, the agencies that oversee those industries in Europe said in a joint report in August.

The Financial Stability Board, a group of central bankers and regulators from Europe, the United States, China and other countries, is also worried. The board said on Oct 13 that it was scrutinising whether CLOs posed a risk to the global financial system.

The quandary for insurers is that fewer and fewer bonds - generally safe investments - pay a positive interest rate. A few weeks ago, even Greece sold short-term bonds with negative interest. In an auction, investors bid the rate down to negative 0.02 per cent.

The bond sale was extraordinary considering that, less than a decade ago, investors in Greek government bonds were forced to take losses of 50 per cent as part of a bailout plan.

Deliberate result

Low and negative interest rates are no accident. They are the deliberate result of policies by the European Central Bank (ECB) to deal with a debt crisis and chronic slow growth. The bank has purchased bonds on the open market to push down interest rates. And as a further inducement to lend, the ECB charges a negative interest rate on deposits that commercial banks stash in the central bank's coffers.

There is a growing backlash against these stimulus measures. Low and negative interest rates have rippled through "the entire financial sector", a group of former central bankers said in a letter to the ECB in October. The scramble for higher rates has pushed up the price of riskier investments and "ultimately threatens to result in an abrupt market correction or even in a deep crisis".

Whether to continue to encourage negative rates will probably be the key question confronting Christine Lagarde, who succeeded Mario Draghi as ECB president on Nov 1.

Mr Draghi said last month that negative interest rates had "been a very positive experience", stimulating growth and helping reduce unemployment. "The improvements in the economy have more than offset negative side effects from low rates," he said.

Regulators fear that a deep recession or other shock could force ratings agencies to downgrade BBB bonds en masse. That could cause a panic, because insurers or other institutional investors that are barred from holding debt less than investment grade would be forced to sell at fire-sale prices.

Mr Wilson said Allianz's holdings were diversified enough that it could cope with a rash of downgrades. He argued that insurance companies, despite their enormous presence in financial markets, were unlikely to be the cause of the next financial crisis. They are less interconnected than banks, he said, meaning that the problems of one insurance company would be unlikely to spread like a pandemic through the financial system.

And unlike banks, insurance companies are not dependent on a continuous supply of short-term credit, which can dry up suddenly if banks lose trust in one another. That is what happened in the 2008 financial crisis.

Others are not so sure insurance companies are benign, pointing out that a troubled insurer could create turmoil in bond markets that could easily spread to banks and create a broader crisis.

The big question is what will happen if there is some kind of shock to the financial system that causes government and corporate debt to abruptly lose value. Mr Wilson said he worried about that, too.

"I think the probability has gone up," he said, citing risks such as trade war, conflicts in the Middle East or rising populism. "The number of triggers is manifold and increasing." NYTIMES