Charlie Hebdo, writers and effecting change
THE recent killing of satirists at Paris-based Charlie Hebdo has ignited a maelstrom of discussion about free speech and its limits, particularly in this case in relation to the world's major religions. Various commentaries have been issued, including about the Pope's recent pronouncements.
But the question is, if the satirists had truly wanted to effect change, could they have done it in a more reasoned way? The answer is they could have - but for some writers, the power to provoke is much more important than the message.
This is like a child who throws a tantrum because he wants something and didn't get it, failing to realise that asking nicely in the proper way can create better results. We forget that if we must provoke, there should be a better reason for doing so than simply because we can.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
‘Competition for talent’ a poor excuse to keep key executives’ pay under wraps
OCBC should put its properties into a Reit and distribute the trust’s units to shareholders
Why a stronger US dollar is dangerous
An overstimulated US economy is asking for trouble
Too many property agents? Cap commissions on home sales
Time to study broadening of private market access