Why minority shareholders don't stand a chance
The Datapulse Technology case shows the inadequacies of Singapore's listing rules to protect minority investors, and companies are breaking these rules with impunity, for example by withholding material information.
IN recent years, the lack of effective investor protection in our market has become rather evident. For S-chips and other foreign listings, regulatory enforcement has often been hampered by the inapplicability of laws, cross-border enforcement barriers or runaway miscreants.
However, the Datapulse Technology (DT) case shows that even for Singapore-incorporated and based companies, investor protection leaves much to be desired.
First, the case highlights the deficiencies in our listing rules in protecting minority investors, especially the Chapter 9 rules on "Interested Person Transactions" (IPTs) and the Chapter 10 rules on "Acquisitions and Realisations". DT was able to acquire a company from a vendor who had significant business and employment relationships with both the controlling shareholder and the CEO without being caught by the IPT rules - and it later emerged that the vendor and controlling shareholder had together discussed the acquisition of the controlling stake from the previous controlling shareholder.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
‘Competition for talent’ a poor excuse to keep key executives’ pay under wraps
OCBC should put its properties into a Reit and distribute the trust’s units to shareholders
Why a stronger US dollar is dangerous
An overstimulated US economy is asking for trouble
Too many property agents? Cap commissions on home sales
Time to study broadening of private market access