Will 'worst trade treaty' ride to Trump's rescue?
THE new United States-Mexico-Canada agreement (USMCA), one of the most comprehensive trade agreements outside the EU, comes into force on Wednesday. While the deal remains shrouded in deep political controversy, its achievement underlines the limits to the current deglobalisation era that has been fuelled by the coronavirus crisis.
The USMCA - which is in effect a North America Free Trade Agreement (Nafta) 2.0 - will serve as a political cornerstone of economic relations within the continent, including the more than US$1 trillion in annual trilateral trade. Yet amid the celebrations this coming week of what even "America First" President Donald Trump has previously called a "wonderful" and "historical transaction", there remains much political angst.
Nafta, originally signed in 1994 during Bill Clinton's presidency, was the first major trilateral trade accord negotiated between a developing country (Mexico) and developed counterparts (United States and Canada). That distinctive era, soon after the end of the Cold War, saw economic globalisation largely unchallenged as a political orthodoxy across much the world.
KEYWORDS IN THIS ARTICLE
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
‘Competition for talent’ a poor excuse to keep key executives’ pay under wraps
OCBC should put its properties into a Reit and distribute the trust’s units to shareholders
Why a stronger US dollar is dangerous
An overstimulated US economy is asking for trouble
Too many property agents? Cap commissions on home sales
Time to study broadening of private market access