UK watchdog proposes ban on car, home insurance 'loyalty penalties'
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
[LONDON] Britain's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said on Tuesday it was proposing to stop insurers from charging more to repeat car and home insurance customers than to new clients.
When a customer renews their home or motor insurance policy, they would be paying no more than they would if they were new to their provider through the same sales channel, such as online,the FCA said.
"The FCA estimates that its proposals will save consumers £3.7 billion (S$6.46 billion) over 10 years," said Christopher Woolard, the FCA's interim chief executive.
It singled out "price walking" or complex pricing practices that allow insurers to raise prices for consumers who renew their car and home insurance policies year after year.
The aim is to stop loyal customers being penalised, the FCA said on Tuesday.
It identified six million policyholders paying high or very high margins in 2018, who could have saved £1.2 billion.
Navigate Asia in
a new global order
Get the insights delivered to your inbox.
"For existing consumers, their renewal price would be no higher than the equivalent new business price," the watchdog said.
The FCA is also proposing rules requiring insurers to consider how they offer fair value to customers over the longer term, and to report data to the watchdog so that it can check the new rules are being followed.
The proposals are being put out to public consultation until January, with final rules published next year.
REUTERS
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Share with us your feedback on BT's products and services
TRENDING NOW
Autobahn Rent A Car directors declared bankrupt over S$50 million each owed to DBS
Amazon’s MGM Studios gains creative control over ‘James Bond’ franchise
UOB’s Wee Ee Cheong says S$4.9 billion Citi deal ‘paying off’ as Asean push accelerates
In taxing wealth, how far can Singapore push property owners?