In risk-based regulation, brokers and investors should play their part
EVER since the Singapore Exchange (SGX) first announced in a Practice Note in February 2004 that it is shifting to risk-based regulation, its regulatory efforts have been largely focused on areas it considers "high risk''.
At the time, the exchange said this meant it would no longer vet routine company documents which require straightforward disclosures and would instead reallocate its resources to more important issues. This was - and still is - wholly in line with the requirements of a disclosure-based regime where the regulator intervenes only occasionally and the primary responsibility for good governance and the preparation of documents for public dissemination rests on companies themselves.
Such is the approach in most developed markets such as the US and UK, where companies have to adhere to stringent reporting requirements and finance professionals follow strict ethical guidelines. Properly administered, such a system offers many benefits. For example, studies have shown that companies that conduct their affairs openly and transparently will, over time, gain the market's trust and should therefore find capital raising that much easier.
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
‘Competition for talent’ a poor excuse to keep key executives’ pay under wraps
OCBC should put its properties into a Reit and distribute the trust’s units to shareholders
Why a stronger US dollar is dangerous
An overstimulated US economy is asking for trouble
Too many property agents? Cap commissions on home sales
Time to study broadening of private market access