Unintended costs of "de-risking" by banks must be mitigated
SINCE the global financial crisis of 2008, financial institutions have endured a slew of regulatory strictures, ranging from prescriptions on capital adequacy to a broadening of anti-money laundering (AML) laws.
The rules set out to reinforce financial systems' resilience and halt the use of banks as conduits for illicit activity such as tax evasion and the financing of terrorist activities. It is clear from recent large penalties that flouting the rules is costly. In 2015, a US judge slapped a US$8.9 billion fine on BNP Paribas for breaking sanctions against three regimes. In 2012, HSBC paid US$1.9 billion in fines to the US authorities over the laundering of drug money out of Mexico. Even Singapore has meted regulatory action. Last year, two Swiss banks - BSI Bank and Falcon Private Bank - were shut down over AML breaches and some banks were fined.
It is therefore not surprising that globally, banks are choosing to "de-risk'', that is, to terminate or restrict relationships with certain types of clients to avoid risk. Today, however, there is increasing concern that de-risking - a rational response to increasingly onerous regulations - is creating unintended consequences. As banks cut down on their "correspondent banking relationships'' (CBRs) - relationships with other banks to enable the completion of transactions such as cross-border payments and foreign currency settlements - access to much-needed finance in the emerging markets is being cut off. This chokes off trade financing, and disproportionately affects small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in developing countries. Even charities in high-risk areas are hard hit; some have had bank accounts closed without explanation.
KEYWORDS IN THIS ARTICLE
BT is now on Telegram!
For daily updates on weekdays and specially selected content for the weekend. Subscribe to t.me/BizTimes
Columns
‘Competition for talent’ a poor excuse to keep key executives’ pay under wraps
OCBC should put its properties into a Reit and distribute the trust’s units to shareholders
Why a stronger US dollar is dangerous
An overstimulated US economy is asking for trouble
Too many property agents? Cap commissions on home sales
Time to study broadening of private market access